INPUT Government Technology Market Blog

California might open pension system to public

States are proposing new "mega' systems that will include large processing volumes and wide-ranging interfaces with the public. Massachusetts' Health Connector is a good example. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger want to open CalPERS to the public. Other states will follow in coming years.

As you have probably heard, the states and localities are facing pension shortfalls totaling into the hundreds of billions of dollars. In fact, with many public employees approaching retirement age, pension obligations might be the single biggest fiscal problem facing the public sector. However, one state--California--is trying to rise above the fray. While most jurisdictions are just beginning to consider cutting the pension obligations to current and future retirees, the Bear Flag Republic is considering opening its CalPERS fund to employers who cannot afford to provide retirement benefits to their workers.

Historically, the market for government-to-employees (G2E) solutions has been little more than a niche--usually an add-on to larger government-to-citizen (G2C) market for e-government solutions. Employee benefits management systems have been modest, back-end oriented affairs. However, opening them up the public would involve significant investment in interfaces for tens of thousands of employers and millions of workers.

If California is able to shore up its pension fund for another decade or two--as well as raise the overall level of savings of the state's private-sector workforce--with this approach other states will surely follow. During an economic downturn state and local governments often make matters worse with layoffs as well as pay and pension cuts that only further depress the local or regional economy. Such measures also make it harder for agencies to attract skilled workers down the road.

Vendors in the benefits management space should keep a close eye on CalPERS.

The Great Asset Sell-Off -- Are Lotteries Next?

Forty-three states have lotteries and nearly a dozen of them have bandied about the idea of privatizing their lottery as a quick way to get some cold hard cash. That's a trend any way you look at it. While no governor has successfully done a deal yet, you can bet one of them will and when the first one goes -- watch out for the rest.

According to an article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch Virginia Delegate David E. Poisson (D-Loudoun) is the latest. In an era where tax increases are non-starters with most voters and many politicans don't want to cut spending, selling off lotteries becomes an inticing proposition. Privatization has been proposed in California, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Texas. This year the governors of Kentucky and Vermont raised the subject in their state of the state speeches.

States have long struggled with government-sponsored gambling. They like the additional revenue, but don't like the associated social issues such as gambling addiction and the troubling fact that most people who play the lottery earn less money and have less education than average citizens. In Virginia, the lottery is prohibited by law from airing ads that induce people to play; promotions may only be informational. When a private operator takes over from any state, they will likely introduce new, more popular games and use commercial marketing best practices, including technology to target likely gamblers, to generate more sales.

If lottery sell-offs follow the pattern of privatizing toll roads, the state that goes first may have it best. Only after the foreign-owned company that took over operations of the Skyway, a 7.8 mile stretch of underperforming tollroad, and drastically raised the tolls, other states began inserting language that limited the annual amount of toll increases in their deals with potential private operators. This will be important as the lottery privatization debate plays out because we're not talking chump change. California's lottery is valued at $14 to $37 billion and Vermont's could go for as much as a $1 billion. Former governor, Eliot Spitzer, estimated that $4 billion for some portion of the New York State Lottery could generate $200 million a year for higher education and $2 billion annually for primary and secondary education.